Marking Criteria and Assessment Transparency Policy

Purpose

Central Global University is committed to ensuring fairness, consistency, and transparency in the assessment and grading of student work. This policy outlines how marking criteria, grading scales, and assessment standards are communicated and applied across all courses.

Scope

This policy applies to all assessments conducted within:

  • Undergraduate and postgraduate programs
  • Online, blended, and on-campus courses
  • Formative and summative assessments

Principles of Assessment Transparency

Assessment and grading practices are guided by the following principles:

  • Clarity and accessibility of marking criteria
  • Consistency in grading standards
  • Fair and unbiased evaluation
  • Alignment with learning outcomes
  • Accountability in assessment decisions

Marking Criteria and Rubrics

Each assessment includes clearly defined marking criteria that specify:

  • Performance expectations
  • Criteria for each grade level
  • Weighting of assessment components
  • Standards for academic quality

Marking rubrics are designed to help students understand how their work will be evaluated.

Communication to Students

Marking criteria and grading information are communicated to students through:

  • Course guides and syllabi
  • Learning Management System (LMS) assessment pages
  • Assessment briefs and instructions

All criteria are provided before assessment submission deadlines.

Grading Scales

The university applies consistent grading scales across programs. Grading scales outline:

  • Grade descriptors
  • Performance thresholds
  • Pass and fail criteria

This ensures comparability and fairness across courses and departments.

Consistency and Moderation

To maintain consistent grading standards:

  • Academic staff follow approved marking rubrics
  • Moderation processes are applied where appropriate
  • Quality assurance reviews monitor grading practices

Feedback to Students

Students receive constructive feedback that:

  • Explains assessment outcomes
  • Highlights strengths and areas for improvement
  • Supports learning and academic development
  • Feedback is provided within reasonable timeframes.

Review and Appeals

Students who wish to seek clarification or review of assessment results may do so through established academic review or appeal procedures.

Policy Governance

Policy Owner: Academic Affairs
Approval Authority: University Management
Effective Date: January 2025
Review Cycle: Annual